Checking Accounts Versus Savings Accounts

The line between checking accounts and savings accounts seems to be blurring. For example, many online checking accounts pay interest. Also, the interest paid on savings accounts currently is so low that people are wondering why even bother setting up and maintaining one of those. Yet, there are major differences between checking and savings accounts. Understanding those helps you make smart decisions about your financial affairs.

In essence, whether you have a traditional checking account housed in a brick-and-mortar institution or an online one operating solely in cyberspace, its purpose is to facilitate financial transactions. You use it to pay bills, withdraw cash you need, transfer funds, and deposit or have automatically deposited payments made to you. Those incoming funds could range from print paychecks to electronic payments from Social Security or PayPal. There are no limits on the number of withdraws, transfers, or deposits. The fees involved and any perks, such interest and bonuses, depend on the specific bank. Given the range of options, it could be worth your time to shop around for the best deal for your needs.

On the other hand, savings accounts, be they in your trusty bank branch or only online, are structured and regulated for “housing” funds that you hope you will not need to tap into for the near future. You might have a specific short-term goal such as saving for a down payment on a house or a child’s wedding. In return you receive interest. Unfortunately, at this time, most rates are under one percent.

If you sensed you would not be needing that money for a longer period, say a year or more, then you would probably choose a Certificate of Deposit (CD). In exchange for having those funds to use for a guaranteed period, banks pay higher return rates on CDs. Should you have to gain access to the cash sooner, you would likely pay a penalty.

In the U.S., savings accounts come under Regulation D, 12. That is what makes this sort of account so different from a checking one. Regulation D limits the amount of withdraws and transfers to six a month. That means that most people, with the average amount of bills to pay, cannot facilitate that through a savings account. Violations of Regulation D could result in a service charge or downgrade of the account to a checking one. However, there is no limit on the number of deposits. The terms and conditions, including fees and the rate of interest, vary among financial institutions. Some consumers are finding higher interest rates through online savings accounts.

Yes, checking and savings accounts can be linked. That can prevent overdraft charges in the checking account. However, the two are very different entities. Rarely can they substitute for one another. For example, those intending to “save” and maintain that level of funds usually cannot accomplish that in a checking account. On the other hand, savings accounts are not made to process the amount of financial transactions most Americans are responsible for.

Alternatives to Checking Accounts

A growing number of consumers are choosing alternates to the traditional checking account. Some have become frustrated by the increasing number and amount of fees for checking accounts. Others are unable to open an account because they have received a negative rating by ChexSystems for too many bounced checks or unpaid overdrafts. Then there are those who never have become part of the standard financial system. According to a 2012 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) survey, about 10 million U.S. adults do not have a bank account. The good news for all of them is that businesses, ranging from financial institutions to retailers, have found there is profit in designing and making the alternates available. Those new options have been reducing the usual high cost of financial transactions, such as paying bills or cashing a pay check, without a checking account.

The most popular alternate is the prepaid vehicle. They involve no verification of a credit score or listing on ChexSystems. Prepaid can come in the form of a debit or credit card. Essentially these represent what the financial services industry calls “stored value.” They are cards which are preloaded with funds and can be continually reloaded.

There are many versions of them so comparison shopping is a must. For example, the older forms, which had developed loyal customers, continue to impose relatively high fees. Those could be for activation or each deposit. They may also require a minimum initial deposit.

Newer entries to this market, however, frequently have no or low activation or monthly fees and allow unlimited free deposits at brick-and-mortar financial institutions, retailers, online, and ATMs. A former drawback had been that funds were not insured by the FDIC. But now more new entries to this market provide that FDIC protection up to $250,000.

As for paying bills, some of the newer ones are allowing check writing, electronic payments, and even ordering merchandise online and renting cars. For that, most do charge a fee per transaction. How much varies. Again, read the fine print.

Since the prepaid product space is becoming increasingly competitive, including partnerships between giant financial institutions and retailers, consumers should make it their business to be on the look-out for introductory and special offers. They can do that by surfing the web under keywords “prepaid cards,” reading the promotional material coming in snail mail, studying the ads in the media, and talking with friends.

Another alternate is through mobile technology. Both established financial institutions and entrepreneurs are developing ways to deposit funds and pay bills without having to open the classic checking account. Often those are hybrids which combine the basic services of checking with no monthly management or overdraft fees. That waiver of fees is a common feature of Internet banking.

The more traditional option for paying bills without a checking account is through money orders. For them, fees vary. It is worth comparison shopping for the amount of fees.

Financial Windfall: Now, What to Do?

A financial windfall can be a mixed blessing. On the one hand, who doesn’t welcome additional money? Those funds could come from winning the lottery, inheritance, gift, tax refund, sale of assets, work bonus, or damages from a lawsuit. On the other hand, the money means making decisions about what to do with it. What makes this especially difficult is that there are no absolute right or wrong answers about these matters. Sure, there are general guidelines. But those may not be the best fit for a person’s specific financial situation. Yet, choices will have to be made.

Where there is no choice is attending to any tax liabilities associated with the windfall. Also, fees may have to be paid, as with a commission to the real estate agent or the plaintiff lawyer who won or settled the litigation. What’s left over becomes the balance. Here are the standard options for dealing with it.

Reserve fund. A survey by MetLife found that 50% of those interviewed had less than a month’s living expenses socked away. The Great Recession and acts of nature like Hurricane Sandy taught us that emergencies happen more often than one tends to anticipate. How much of a reserve is recommended? About six months is the rule of thumb. The amount should be enough to cover mortgage/rent, heat/electricity, food, and minimum payments on debt. However, that is not cast in stone. Workers, such as laid-off plumbers, whose skill is in demand, would probably need less since they wouldn’t be jobless for long. Those, such as lawyers, whose industry is downsizing, would need more.

Debt re-payment. Obviously, those debts with the highest interest rates should be paid off first and, if possible, in full. There could be wiggle room if debtors are “buying time” through transferring high-interest credit card balances to zero- or low-interest accounts. If that’s possible, then the question arises if it’s financially smarter to keep stalling as long as possible paying off the balance and invest the money in a CD or a down payment for a house.

Most personal finance advisors tend to be conservative. They’d opt for getting rid of debt. To begin with, it has a negative impact on the FICO or credit score. That, in turn, can affect myriad kinds of financial transactions. For instance, a low FICO score could raise the interest rate on a home loan. In addition, there’s no guarantee that attractive credit card balance transfer offers will be available when the last one expires. That could saddle the debtor with, say, a $24,000 balance at a double-digit interest rate.


With so many financial vehicles available, where to put savings demands research. It’s a mistake to deposit the money in a checking account that yields no interest. Since it loses value because of inflation, it’s comparable to sticking money under the mattress. One option is some kind of savings account. Some financial institutions impose a fee for even a plain-vanilla savings account. That’s one issue to look into. The other is the rate of interest. Is it higher than the rate of inflation? Another option, if the money isn’t needed immediately, is to consider a Certificate of Deposit. The terms and conditions for those, as to interest rate and time the money is tied up, are varied. Therefore, shopping around is necessary.


Those who already have investment accounts, both individual and through employers, can increase their contribution. If they don’t have them, they can start one or more. Often, a windfall gives those employed the financial “breathing space” to finally participate in an employer-sponsored retirement account. Employers sometimes contribute to those.

In all investing, there is risk. That’s the rub. Here the decisions involve how much risk to take. That usually depends on a person’s tolerance for risk, age, other financial assets, and yield objectives. The prudent approach is to interview a number of investment counselors. Chemistry and ability to trust are key. Fee structure is another consideration. Also, it can be useful to request references to speak with. Questions should range from concerns about integrity to financial outcomes, both gains and losses. Until any investment choices are made, the funds can sit in an interest-bearing savings account.

As lottery winners soon realize, windfalls can create a new kind of stress. It takes clear, methodical financial thinking to navigate through all the opportunities to use the funds to improve one’s financial security. You’ll need to pay taxes and any associated fees right away, but other than that, there isn’t any reason to rush into doing anything.

Life Insurance – Who Needs It?

Purchasing life insurance has become a personal-finance decision more people are considering. That’s because fewer are receiving life insurance as an employer-paid benefit. Or, they can lose it during layoffs, which are the new normal in a volatile economy. Like all topics in personal finance, life insurance is a complex one. This blog will focus only on who really needs to purchase it. The issue is important because those who need it and don’t have it risk financial ruin. At present, according to LIMRA, only about 44 percent of households have an individual life insurance policy. On the other hand, those who don’t need it and are paying for it could be using the funds for other purposes, such as paying off college loans.

Essentially there are two types of life insurance. One is whole life, which can function as an investment vehicle. It tends to be relatively expensive. As its name “whole life” indicates, it extends for one’s entire life. However, because of its cost, in hard times, policy holders often wind up dropping it and not replacing it with the lower-cost and more flexible option – term insurance. That’s a serious mistake.

For the cost of a latte or two a week, a healthy male can purchase life insurance for a “term” of 20 years with a payout of about $500,000. The good news here is that over the years, the cost of term life insurance has been going down. Term life can be a perfect fit for him since his financial obligations to his two children will end in 20 years. After that he may decide not to carry any life insurance, especially since the cost of even term goes up substantially with age.

This man is typical of those needing insurance. He has dependents. Without dependents and if his wife is employed, he might opt for no insurance. Most single people ignore – and rightly so – buying life insurance. However, this man with no children and a working wife may decide he needs life insurance as his aging parents become financially dependent on him. He may buy whole life instead since he cannot predict how long they will live and would prefer to also be building a nest egg for them.

Another kind of scenario is the affluent person or business owner whose funds will be tied up in probate upon death. They would likely purchase insurance policies as part of their estate planning. Those funds would be available immediately. They can pay the one-time cost of burial, debts, and the ongoing usual expenses. That carries the heirs and the business over until the estate is settled, which could take months or even years.

Some people who carry high credit card balances consider buying life insurance so that family members, none of them dependent, aren’t saddled with the debt. That’s unnecessary. Unless anyone has co-signed those accounts or the state is a community property one, the credit card balances are automatically eliminated upon death.

Decisions become more complex financially as a person ages or health problems develop and the dependent situation changes. The wife may lose her job after 20 years. She can’t get another one. Without the husband’s income, she couldn’t manage to make ends meet. A child becomes disabled. Because of all these possibilities, some opt for purchasing and making sacrifices to hold on to a whole life policy when they are young and healthy. This provides peace of mind, in the event of family reversals.

Of course, once the decision is made to purchase life insurance, then come all the other choices, such as how much coverage is enough, what distribution channel should be used to make the purchase, and what information is objective and trustworthy. However, what matters to prevent financial catastrophe is for those who need life insurance to not delay in getting it. Because, unlike auto insurance, this is a voluntary purchase, so there’s a tendency for people to drag their feet. That could lead to a financial disaster.

Affordable Housing – Could Be Worth the Red Tape

Economic turbulence, aging Baby Boomers, and the disabled seeking independent living have increased the interest in “affordable housing.” And with good reason. Obtaining a rental officially classified by government entities as “affordable” can mean the difference between living comfortably and financial insolvency or even homelessness. The problems is that, because this rental category is highly regulated, applicants have to invest the time to understand the red tape and then wade through it. Only if the program they enter represents a significant savings to them might it be worth going through the process.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) defines “affordable housing” as monthly rent which consumes no more than one-third of a family’s or individual’s gross income. That could be from earning wages, public assistance, Social Security, disability payments, or a combination of those. Since the calculated rent, as at Bella Vista, New Haven, Connecticut, frequently includes utilities such as heat, there is considerably less anxiety about being able to pay for necessities. Given the unusually cold winter in New England in 2013, that savings was substantial.

Those “affordable” rental units can come in the form of HUD apartments, public housing apartments, low income apartments, subsidized apartments, and local housing authorities. They may be under the complete authority of one or more government entities, federal, state, and local. Or they could be owned and managed by a for-profit company such as Vesta, but still under multiple government jurisdictions.

Listings for all of them can be found on the Internet under keywords such as “affordable housing” merged with the name of the state such as “Connecticut.” Here is an example: Another way of finding out what’s available is through word of mouth. Those in a senior citizen club or at disability daycare are likely to give other members the scoop. Also, those checking into this option can call the rental office of a complex. Since the eligibility rules can be complex, it is useful to sit down with rental agents and be briefed in person. Then there can be a tour of sample units.

Although all are subsidized and regulated by one or more government entities, the rules vary, even among the buildings in one development. Some of the buildings or a certain number of units might be reserved only for senior citizens. In that case there could be a range of subsidized programs. The age of eligibility might be different for each complex and that could change over time for the same complex. There might be no maximum on the amount of income or assets the elderly can have. If they are significant, the aging could simply be assigned what is called “market rate.” That is likely lower than the average price of a rental in the community but higher than the usual one-third of income rents charged the low income and some disabled. At Bella Vista the market rate for the elderly was about $734 during the winter of 2013.

Applicants should be prepared to get on waiting lists for whatever developments they are eligible to rent in. There has been a chronic shortage of available affordable rentals. According to the National Low Income Housing Coalition, only about a third of those who qualify for them will find one available. No state has enough units. In some, such as Nevada, it is worse than in others.

In response to the severe economic downturn in which too many got behind on the rent, many affordable housing complexes have become stricter on eligibility requirements. Currently, they also take legal action quickly on late payments. Therefore, those with “bad credit” can be knocked out of the box. One way around that is to have someone with “good credit” apply for the apartment. If the rent might be late, residents would be smart to find a relative or friend to borrow it from. The powers-that-be have become unforgiving when it comes to paying the rent in full and on time.

As the economy improves, the demand for affordable housing could lessen. Also, those who have been living in it could decide to trade up to traditional rentals or even purchase a home. Both of those could free up units for other applicants.

Multiple Sources of Income: Spreading the Risk

The Great Recession delivered a wake-up call for many employees, the self-employed, and those living from the passive income of investments. They recognized how quickly they could go from financial security to insolvency. All they had to do was lose a job, a few clients or customers, or the value of the assets in their portfolio. In her 2013 book Down the Up Escalator, money expert Barbara Garson chronicles those horror stories. One solution for preventing another personal finance disaster is to develop multiple sources of income. Instead of being totally dependent on one full-time job, for example, those who multi-stream income create a variety of other ways to make money. With a global economy continually disrupted by technology, this approach could become the new normal. Here are four steps for making this shift.

The First Step

The first step is to improve the security of the main source of income. If that’s serving three major clients in a consulting business, monitor what more can be done or done differently. Never should the quest for additional income endanger that. Unlike what will be tried, that represents a known. It’s a proven source of revenue.

The Second Step

The second step is to investigate how existing experience, skills, resources, and contacts can be transformed into money-making possibilities. The options include:

  • Searching for a full-time job after a time of self-employment, part-time work, or temping. A changing economy means demand’s always changing. Those shut out a few years ago, such as truckers, could now be in short supply. The mistake is to rule out returning to full-time work in a field that had been hit hard during the downturn. If hired, the objective should be to retain as many current income-producing situations as possible. For example, the former truckers might have been painting houses, cleaning basements, and working part-time at a moving firm. They should push to have that re-scheduled around their new hours.
  • Adding on freelance, part-time, and temp opportunities. Technology and global time zones make it possible to work full time and do plenty on the side. That ranges from developing apps for a smartphone to teaching English as a Second Language from a home office in New Haven, Connecticut, to students in China. Online sites such as craigslist provide free worldwide help-wanted ads for all kinds of situations. In addition, most industries have specialized free global listings, such as and for writers.
  • Socking away more in financial investments. Having multiple sources of income can free up funds to put in accounts such as retirement, which employers contribute to.
  • Investing in tangible assets. A common example is rental property. All that’s needed is the money. For a fee, management companies will take care of the rest.

The Third Step

The third step is to explore acquiring new skills. In this Do-It-Yourself (DIY) era, ambitious people are re-inventing themselves through free or low-cost training online or through books at the public library. Where there’s already an aptitude, the learning comes easily.

The part-time copywriter can develop comprehensive expertise in search-engine optimization (SEO). That could lead to owning and operating a side business in SEO, with contract employees doing the actual assignments. The full-time web developer can learn to code, doing temp assignments evenings and weekends. The dog walker can pick up the fundamentals of training, gaining experience and references through doing the service free.

The Fourth Step

The fourth step is to continually evaluate which initiatives are the most profitable. According to the Pareto Principle, 80% of outcomes, including revenue, come from 20% of inputs. Applied to business, that means that smart managers will focus primarily on the 80% of the tasks, clients, or customers that yield the most results.

Over time, it could turn out that buying up rentals is more lucrative than working full-time as a teller in a bank. The freelance coding is where the most profit is coming with the least hours worked and the least stress. Therefore, the coder might look for a full-time job doing that or create a startup for that business. The dog walker might invest in advertising the more lucrative training part of the business.

Few human beings welcome change. Yet, establishing multiple sources of income can open up fresh, lucrative options. Next would come the decisions about which one or ones to make priorities and which to treat as additives. In the wings could be major career shifts. Those could represent an awesome payoff on the initiative and courage to reach beyond traditional approaches to build financial security.

Flood Insurance: What Homeowners, Renters Still Need to Know

Thanks to so-called “storms of the century,” like Irene and Sandy, homeowners and renters currently know a lot more about flood insurance. For example, a Bankrate survey found that 81% understood that standard policies exclude flood coverage. That is a special kind of protection. Although it is only provided by the federal National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), it is available through commercial insurance agents. That is mandatory for those with federally backed mortgages who are based in zones designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA).

However, as with much of insurance, which is a complex topic, there remain huge information gaps. This can present a major challenge in managing personal finance. That is because FEMA documents that floods are the top national disaster and they occur in all states. While homeowners and renters may fear fire, there is a greater possibility that they will be victims of flooding.

The most common knowledge deficit is about how much coverage is provided and for what. Yet this is what must be factored in before purchasing property in a high-risk flood area. FEMA makes those designations. Those rankings are available at Federal flood insurance is only available for up to $250,000 for damage to the building and $100,000 for contents. Private insurance can supplement that, but it is expensive. That means that buying a million-dollar home in such an area could mean financial ruin if there is a major flood. In addition, buyers might think twice about investing in sprucing up the basement. Insurance does not cover any renovations done below ground.

The story about content can be equally chilling. What is in the basement probably will not be covered. That ranges from the entertainment center to the equipment for the home office down there. As for the content in the rest of the owned property or rental, the news is not good either. The terms and conditions about reimbursements for content are based on “actual,” not “replacement” value of content. Given depreciation, the current fair value of a sofa may be $150. But it could cost $1,100 for a comparable piece of furniture.

A third sobering reality, which homeowners and renters might not know, is that flood policies do not pay for alternate living expenses. If the primary residence has been waterfront property in an expensive area like New York’s Hamptons, then shelling out for hotels and rentals will also be high. That means homeowners could be hit twice. Once would be through the loss of their property. The second hit would be through having to shell out ongoing lodging expenses.

A fourth not well-known fundamental about flood insurance is the likelihood that it will be needed. According to FEMA, 25% of flood claims are made by those in low- to moderate-risk areas. Here there is good news. Because of the reduced risk, there are preferred-risk policies with lower premiums. For homeowners they start at $129 for property and contents, and for renters for contents only at $49. Being on a high floor also does not protect from flooding. The flood can destroy pilings. The whole edifice could collapse. Therefore condo and co-op owners would be out the value of both their property and content.

Weather experts continue to disagree if there is global warming or the beginning of a mini-Ice Age. However, what is certain is that during the past several years there have been unusual weather events. Some of them caused flooding. The future cannot be predicted by the past. But, the risk of a flood seems higher for all parts of the nation than it had previously. It seems especially high for areas near the water and low-lying regions.